If I’m being totally honest, I’m not getting enough feedback on the code I’m doing. This might be unavoidable but is worth noting.
- Need to get more familiar with standard error.
- Review notes see if I can create some new ones.
- Rolling brief, explain mass flow using screenshots from excel of fuel.
Complexity at the heart of software and Vernons thoughts. Expanding on my thinking with replication of model.
Expectations = claims about future events.
I’m not looking at knowledge creation, more just knowledge externalization. I think if I perceive the externalization of tacit knowledge as the goal where tacit knowledge is related to assumptions and credences of results.
Can I replicate the sensitivity analysis with mass balance branch?
Systematic error is shifting by a constant.
The likelihood is low that I would be able to do anything useful but could I take a look at agent based programming or Bayesian based programming to incorporate assumptions into a model. Like how I’ve been thinking about the tacit knowledge involved in this project.